Ceramic MEMS

Introduction

Polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs) are a class of ceramics that can be prepared, without any additives, by the thermal handling of appropriate precursors in an inert or reactive atmosphere. PDCs present exceptional properties that include stability towards oxidation and corrosion, as well as crystallization and creep resistance up to very high temperatures.[1]

In our group, we research on the materials’ property improvement and tuning as well as suitable shaping techniques targeting applications in the fields of MEMS and biomedical implants. For the latter, we also investigate the biocompatibility and electrochemical behavior.

Shaping

PDCs can be applied as thin coatings or shaped by casting as well as (stereo)lithography. We focus on developing new (micro)mold fabrication strategies achieving parts with complex shapes and high precision. For this, established photolithography methods are utilized, optimized, and combined in CMi. Resulting molds are further processed, e.g. adding features by two photon polymerization (2PP) or applying coatings for improved wettability and demoldability before casting the precursor inside. A schematic overall summary is given in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Fabrication overview of complex shape PDC microparts with custom properties and potential applications.

Material

The PDC processing route allows multiple ways of adjusting the resulting ceramics’ composition and microstructure and hence mechanical or functional properties. Starting from different kinds of so-called preceramic polymers (PCPs) such as polysiloxanes or polysilazanes, fillers, catalysts, or initiators can be added. By means of thermal treatment or UV-irradiation, the liquid precursors transform into fused greenbodies as they crosslink (Figure 2). Subsequent pyrolysis, typically in inert atmosphere at temperatures between 700°C and 1600°C, transforms the greenbodies into inorganic (polymer-derived) ceramic material such as silicon carbonitride (SiCN) or silicon oxycarbide (SiOC). The choice of the related parameters such as atmosphere, heating and cooling rate, as well as peak pyrolysis temperature and dwell time determines the resulting characteristics. A strategy to increase the PDC’s electrical conductivity for example is the addition of conductive filler phase (e.g. carbon) and higher pyrolysis treatment to establish a C percolation network in the material.

Figure 2: Schematic PDC processing route: a) Mold filling in protective atmosphere, b) UV or thermal curing and greenbody demolding, c) high temperature pyrolysis, d) final PDC micropart.

C-MEMS

Other selected polymers (such as the epoxy-based photoresist SU-8) can be converted into glassy carbon (GC) by inert gas pyrolysis at temperatures around 900°C. While this material family allows a smaller range of property controllability and typically lower mechanical properties compared to PDCs, its strength is the extraordinary shape control by direct photolithography. In this way, extremely precise 2D or 2.5D MEMS and microparts can be produced in GC. Being electrically conductive, a range of applications such as electrodes and sensors is investigated.

 

Biocompatibility and electrochemistry

Figure 3. a) Schematics for pacemaker electrodes b) PDC electrode testing platform c) Setup for electrochemical characterization of PDCs

A pacemaker is a surgically implantable electronic device that stimulates the heart muscle to maintain an adequate heartbeat. In the pacemaker, the electrode is designed to be fixed to the cardiac tissue to deliver electrical pulses. The state-of-the-art pacemaker electrode is metal electrodes coated with Pt or TiN (Figure 3a). In our research, we apply PDCs as pacemaker electrode instead of metal to minimize foreign body reaction. A PDMS-based testing platform is fabricated to evaluate the PDC electrode and biocompatibility (Figure 3b). Also, the electrochemical properties of the PDC electrodes are characterized by the impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry (Figure 3c).

 

[1] E. Ionescu, “Polymer-derived ceramics“, in Ceramics Science and Technology, Set (R. Riedel and I.-W. Chen, eds.), pp. 457–500, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2013.

 

Keywords: ceramics


Publications

  

Tomographic microscopy of functionally graded polymer-derived SiCN ceramics with tunable gradients

L. Hageluken; M. G. Makowska; F. Marone; J. Brugger 

Materialia. 2024. Vol. 33, p. 102025. DOI : 10.1016/j.mtla.2024.102025.

One-step fabrication of high refractive index inorganic nanostructures

E. Zanchetta; G. Della Giustina; A. Gandin; V. Auzelyte; G. Brusatin 

Journal Of Sol-Gel Science And Technology. 2023. Vol. 107, p. 122 – 132. DOI : 10.1007/s10971-021-05633-8.

SU-8 cantilever with integrated pyrolyzed glass-like carbon piezoresistor

J. Jang; G. Panusa; G. Boero; J. Brugger 

Microsystems & Nanoengineering. 2022. Vol. 8, num. 1, p. 22. DOI : 10.1038/s41378-022-00351-9.

Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing of Silicon Oxycarbide Ceramics

M. Kollep; G. Konstantinou; J. Madrid-Wolff; A. Boniface; L. Hagelüken et al. 

Advanced Engineering Materials. 2022. Vol. 24, num. 7, p. 2101345. DOI : 10.1002/adem.202101345.

Experimental Analysis of Ductile Cutting Regime in Face Milling of Sintered Silicon Carbide

M. Groeb; L. Hagelüken; J. Groeb; W. Ensinger 

Materials. 2022. Vol. 15, num. 7, p. 2409. DOI : 10.3390/ma15072409.

Multiscale 2D/3D microshaping and property tuning of polymer-derived SiCN ceramics

L. Hagelüken; P. V. Warriam Sasikumar; H-Y. Lee; D. Di Stadio; Y. Chandorkar et al. 

Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2021. Vol. 42, num. 5, p. 1963 – 1970. DOI : 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.12.044.

Electrochemical performance of polymer-derived SiOC and SiTiOC ceramic electrodes for artificial cardiac pacemaker applications

J. Jang; P. V. Warriam Sasikumar; F. Navaee; L. Hagelüken; G. Blugan et al. 

Ceramics International. 2020. Vol. 47, num. 6, p. 7593 – 7601. DOI : 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.098.

Cracks, porosity and microstructure of Ti modified polymer-derived SiOC revealed by absorption-, XRD- and XRF-contrast 2D and 3D imaging

M. Makowska; P. V. W. Sasikumar; L. Hagelüken; D. F. Sanchez; N. Casati et al. 

Acta Materialia. 2020. Vol. 198, p. 134 – 144. DOI : 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.067.

Additive micro-manufacturing of crack-free PDCs by two-photon polymerization of a single, low-shrinkage preceramic resin

G. Konstantinou; E. Kakkava; L. Hagelüken; P. V. Warriam Sasikumar; J. Wang et al. 

Additive Manufacturing. 2020.  p. 101343. DOI : 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101343.

In Vitro Cytocompatibility Assessment of Ti-Modified, Silicon-oxycarbide-Based, Polymer-Derived, Ceramic-Implantable Electrodes under Pacing Conditions

P. V. W. Sasikumar; E. Mueller; P. Clement; J. Jang; E. Kakkava et al. 

Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2020. Vol. 12, num. 15, p. 17244 – 17253. DOI : 10.1021/acsami.0c01465.

Growth of Large-Area 2D MoS2 Arrays at Pre-Defined Locations Using Stencil Mask Lithography

I. Sharma; Y. Batra; V. Flauraud; J. Brugger; B. R. Mehta 

Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2018. Vol. 18, num. 3, p. 1824 – 1832. DOI : 10.1166/jnn.2018.14265.

All-in-one self-powered flexible microsystems based on triboelectric nanogenerators

X-S. Zhang; M. Han; B. Kim; J-F. Bao; J. Brugger et al. 

Nano Energy. 2018. Vol. 47, p. 410 – 426. DOI : 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.046.

Harnessing the damping properties of materials for high-speed atomic force microscopy

J. Adams; B. Erickson; J. Grossenbacher; J. Brugger; A. P. Nievergelt et al. 

Nature Nanotechnology. 2016. Vol. 11, p. 147 – 151. DOI : 10.1038/NNANO.2015.254.

Rapid carbon nanotubes suspension in organic solvents using organosilicon polymers

F. Dalcanale; J. Grossenbacher; G. Blugan; M. Gullo; J. Brugger et al. 

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2016. Vol. 470, num. 15, p. 123 – 131. DOI : 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.050.

CNT and PDCs: A fruitful association? Study of a polycarbosilane–MWCNT composite

F. Dalcanale; J. Grossenbacher; G. Blugan; M. R. Gullo; J. Brugger et al. 

Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2015. Vol. 35, num. 8, p. 2215 – 2224. DOI : 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.02.016.

Cytotoxicity evaluation of polymer-derived ceramics for pacemaker electrode applications

J. Grossenbacher; M. Gullo; F. Dalcanale; G. Blugan; J. Kuebler et al. 

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2015. Vol. 103, num. 11, p. 3625 – 3632. DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.35477.

On the micrometre precise mould filling of liquid polymer derived ceramic precursor for 300-µm-thick high aspect ratio ceramic MEMS

J. Grossenbacher; R. M. Gullo; V. Bakumov; G. Blugan; J. Kuebler et al. 

Ceramics International. 2015. Vol. 41, num. 1, p. 623 – 629. DOI : 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.112.

Influence of carbon enrichment on electrical conductivity and processing of polycarbosilane derived ceramic for MEMS applications

F. Dalcanale; J. Grossenbacher; G. Blugan; R. M. Gullo; A. Lauria et al. 

Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2014. Vol. 34, num. 15, p. 3559 – 3570. DOI : 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.06.002.

Curved Holographic Combiner for Color Head Worn Display

M. Guillaumee; S. P. Vahdati; E. Tremblay; A. Mader; G. Bernasconi et al. 

Journal Of Display Technology. 2014. Vol. 10, num. 6, p. 444 – 449. DOI : 10.1109/Jdt.2013.2277933.

Microdrop generation and deposition of ionic liquids

V. J. Cadarso; J. Perera-Nunez; A. Mendez-Vilas; L. Labajos-Broncano; M-L. Gonzalez-Martin et al. 

Journal Of Materials Research. 2014. Vol. 29, num. 17, p. 2100 – 2107. DOI : 10.1557/jmr.2014.162.